1. This section wasn't so bad, I did get a little confused, however, on Lemma 9.29. I guess maybe the notation threw me off a bit, or maybe I just need to read it a few more times to understand it better. ALso, theorem 9.31 was a little confusing for me. I idn't really understand what it meant by F is a field of quotients, and then there is just a lot in that theorem to take in. ANyway, I'll just read them more and more and try to understand them.
2. I like how we're sticking with some of the same notation, like on the top of page 321, the equivalence class of (a,b) is a/b, kinda ilke the congruence classes of functions. Then other than that I like this section, because most of it I felt I understood, and that's always good!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment